About Me

My work did not originate from conventional consulting models, but rather from years of experience dealing with decision-making dynamics under psychological and organizational pressure.

Since 1998, I have worked with situations where clear-cut decisions are no longer possible because the system has lost its sense of direction, comparability, and stable reference points.

  

It all began with the founding of the first specialized consultancy for workplace bullying in Paderborn and North Rhine-Westphalia.

A structural pattern was already evident there: it is not a lack of information that generates instability, but rather a lack of referential capacity within complex social systems.

In parallel, the work was integrated into an interdisciplinary expert context at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), where these dynamics were examined and further developed at a structural level over the course of several years.

As the work progressed, the focus shifted increasingly from individual conflict settings to organizational decision-making contexts.

This represented not a change of topic, but rather a scaling up of the same fundamental question:

How do decisions become possible under conditions of pressure, uncertainty, and a lack of comparability?

This ongoing work led to the development of the Stoklossa Decision Architecture (SDA) and the Stoklossa Formula™ as a structural decision architecture.

It does not describe a method in the classical sense, but rather a system for establishing a frame of reference within decision spaces characterized by complexity.

The focus is not on optimizing individual decisions, but on the structure of the decision space itself.

In practice, it is currently applied through executive VIP sparring at the C-suite and board levels.

The underlying system logic is protected as intellectual property (trademark/patent).